Anywhere But Here (1999)
Synopsis
"Anywhere But Here" (1999) is a poignant drama that explores the complex relationship between a mother and her teenage daughter. Starring Susan Sarandon as the free-spirited and impulsive Adele, the film follows their journey as they leave their mundane life in Wisconsin in search of a more vibrant existence in California. The mother dreams of a glamorous life, while her daughter, Ann (played by Natalie Portman), grapples with the challenges of adolescence and her mother's erratic behavior. As they navigate the ups and downs of their new life, the film delves into themes of identity, independence, and the often tumultuous bond between parent and child. Their adventure is filled with both comedic and heartfelt moments, ultimately leading them to confront their dreams and the realities of their choices.
What is the budget of Anywhere But Here?
"Anywhere But Here" (1999) is a heartfelt drama that captures the intricate dynamics between a mother and her teenage daughter. Directed by Wayne Wang, the film features notable performances from Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman. Released on October 22, 1999, this poignant story not only explores themes of identity and independence but also carries significant financial implications, particularly regarding its budget.
What was the production budget?
The production budget for "Anywhere But Here" was set at $23,000,000. This figure places it within a moderate range for films of its genre during the late 1990s. Compared to similar dramas from that era, such as "The Truth About Cats & Dogs" (1996) with a budget of $16 million, "Anywhere But Here" reflects a slightly higher investment, likely due to its star-studded cast and the ambition of its narrative.
Key Budget Allocation Categories
While specific breakdowns of budget allocation are not publicly available, typical costs for films like this often include:
- Talent Salaries: A significant portion of the budget is usually allocated to the lead actors, especially with established stars like Sarandon and Portman.
- Location Costs: Filming in various locations, particularly in California, can drive up expenses.
- Production Design: Creating an authentic setting for the characters' journey would also contribute to the overall costs.
What were the major production costs?
Several factors contributed to the production costs of "Anywhere But Here."
- Talent: The salaries of Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman were likely among the highest expenses.
- Locations: Filming in multiple locations, including California, added to the logistical costs.
- Set Design and Costumes: Creating a vibrant and believable world for the characters required careful attention to detail.
Notable scenes that may have incurred higher costs include those set in bustling California locales, which often require permits and additional crew.
How did the movie perform at the box office?
"Anywhere But Here" grossed $18,653,615 domestically. This figure indicates a shortfall compared to its production budget, raising questions about its financial success.
Domestic vs. International Breakdown
The film's earnings were primarily domestic, with no significant international box office figures reported. This limited performance highlights the challenges faced by dramas in achieving widespread appeal.
Break-even Point Analysis
To determine the break-even point, a film typically needs to earn about twice its production budget to cover marketing and distribution costs. Given its $23 million budget, "Anywhere But Here" would have needed to gross approximately $46 million to be considered financially successful.
ROI Percentage
With a domestic box office of $18,653,615, the return on investment (ROI) for "Anywhere But Here" is negative, indicating that the film did not recoup its production costs.
Was the movie profitable?
The financial outcome for "Anywhere But Here" suggests it was not profitable. The film's box office earnings fell short of its production budget, leading to a loss for the studio.
Impact on the Studio and Future Budgets
The underperformance of "Anywhere But Here" likely influenced the studio's approach to future projects, particularly in the drama genre. Studios may have become more cautious in investing in similar films, opting for projects with broader commercial appeal.
Records Set
While "Anywhere But Here" did not set any notable records, its financial performance serves as a reminder of the risks associated with producing character-driven dramas.
Commonly Asked Questions
How much did Anywhere But Here (1999) cost to make?
The production cost of "Anywhere But Here" was $23,000,000.
Was Anywhere But Here (1999) profitable?
No, the film was not profitable, as it earned $18,653,615 at the box office, falling short of its production budget.
What was the most expensive element of Anywhere But Here (1999)?
The most expensive elements likely included the salaries of the lead actors, Susan Sarandon and Natalie Portman.
How much did Anywhere But Here (1999) make at the box office?
The film grossed $18,653,615 domestically.
Did Anywhere But Here (1999) go over budget?
There is no public information indicating that "Anywhere But Here" went over budget, but it did not achieve the financial success needed to cover its costs.
In summary, "Anywhere But Here" serves as a case study in the financial challenges faced by character-driven dramas. With a production budget of $23 million and a domestic box office of $18,653,615, the film's financial performance highlights the complexities of achieving profitability in the film industry.
Budget Templates
Build your own production budget
Create professional budgets with AICP and feature film templates. Real-time collaboration, no spreadsheets.
Start Budgeting Free